Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2016cv02436 - Document 18 (N.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/10/17 adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and vacating and remanding the case for further consideration. (Related Docs. 1 and 16 ) (D,MA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO -----------------------------------------------------TYISHA BARBER, On behalf of D.A., Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : CASE NO. 1:16-CV-2436 OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Docs. 1, 16] -----------------------------------------------------JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: On October 4, 2016, Plaintiff Tyisha Barber, on behalf of her minor daughter, D.A., sued to reverse a supplemental security income denial.1 On July 28, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg recommended vacating and remanding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits.2 On August 9, 2017, the Defendant Commissioner notified the Court that it would not file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.3 The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection.4 Failure to timely object waives a party’s right to appeal the magistrate’s report. 5 Absent objection, a district court may adopt the magistrate judge’s report without review.6 Moreover, having conducted its own review of the complaint and record, the Court agrees with the conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. 1 Doc. 1. The Commissioner of Social Security answered. Doc. 10. Doc.16. 3 Doc. 17. 4 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 5 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). 6 See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149. 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case No. 1:16-CV-2436 Gwin, J. For the foregoing reasons, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and VACATES and REMANDS the case for further consideration consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 10, 2017 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
