Williams v. Stipek et al, No. 1:2016cv02420 - Document 8 (N.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: Judgment Entry: For the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum of Opinion and Order, this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/9/17. (LC,S) re 7

Download PDF

Williams v. Stipek et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Vincent Williams, Plaintiff, v. Patricia Stipek, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1: 16 CV 2420 JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN Judgment Entry For the reasons stated in the Court’s accompanying Memorandum of Opinion and Order, this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN United States District Judge Dated: 1/9/17 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.