Bagby v. Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 1:2015cv00973 - Document 3 (N.D. Ohio 2015)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order. Plaintiff is therefore foreclosed from proceeding in forma pauperis (Related doc # 2 ) in this case. This action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/24/2015. (H,CM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bagby v. Exxon Mobil Corp. Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY, Plaintiff, v. EXXON MOBILE CORP., President, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:15 CV 973 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Cedric Wayne Bagby is a Texas state prisoner incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s William P. Clements Unit in Amarillo, Texas. He brings this in forma pauperis action against the President of Exxon Mobile Corporation. The Complaint, which does not set forth coherent allegations, asserts fraud among various companies, “the banks,” and the Internal Revenue Service. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), a prisoner is prohibited from bringing a civil action or appealing a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Plaintiff’s allegations do not reasonably suggest he is in imminent Dockets.Justia.com danger of serious physical injury. In addition, he has, on at least five prior occasions while incarcerated, filed a civil action in federal court that was dismissed as frivolous. See Bagby v. Staples, No.5:13 CV 1092, 2014 WL 7005587 (W.D. Texas Dec. 10, 2014)(dismissing civil rights 42 U.S.C. §1983 action brought by the Plaintiff and citing four previous civil actions the Plaintiff filed in federal courts that were also dismissed as frivolous; Id. at *1, citing Bagby v. Thaler, 1:12 CV 2001 (District of Columbia); Bagby v. President of Bank of America, 1:13 CV 225 (District of Columbia); Bagby v. Thaler, 2:13 CV 12 (N.D. Tex.-Amarillo Division); and Bagby v. Fathi, 4:13 CV 598 (S.D. Tex.-Houston Division)). Plaintiff is therefore foreclosed from proceeding in forma pauperis in this case. Accordingly, this action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: August 24, 2015 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
