Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2014cv01258 - Document 19 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order: Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation (Doc. 18 ), the Court hereby reverses and remands this matter for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Stipulation. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/20/2014. (D,I)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO TAMMY M. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:14-CV-1258 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN BURKE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 19, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that the Court enter judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding the case for further proceedings. Doc. 18 (“Joint Stipulation”). The parties stipulate that: On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to further consider the claimant’s maximum residual functional capacity, with specific reference to the opinion evidence of record, including the report of Dr. Saghafi, evaluate the impact of the claimant’s obesity, per the requirements of Social Security Ruling 02-1p; and, at step five, if warranted, obtain evidence from a vocational expert (20 CFR §§ 404.1565, 416.966 and Social Security Ruling 00-4p). The ALJ will issue a new decision, following consideration of all of the evidence. Doc. 18. Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation, the Court hereby reverses and remands this matter for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Stipulation. Dated: November 20, 2014 ____________________________________ Kathleen B. Burke United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
