Procom Supply, Inc. v. Langner et al, No. 1:2013cv02665 - Document 39 (N.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/2/18 denying plaintiff's requested writ of continuing garnishment for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 37 ) (D,MA)

Download PDF
Procom Supply, Inc. v. Langner et al Doc. 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ----------------------------------------------------------------------PROCOM SUPPLY, INC., Plaintiff, vs. MECHEL LANGNER, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:13-cv-2665 OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. 37] ----------------------------------------------------------------------JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: On April 24, 2014, the Court entered default judgment against each of the Defendants in this matter.1 On September 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed without a corresponding motion or argument a Propos—– Writ of Continuing Garnishm—nt for D—f—n–ant Aharon Mann’s wag—s —arn—– from a corporation in Lakewood, Colorado.2 Based on the face of the proposed writ, the Court seriously doubts that it has jurisdiction over the Colorado employer and, therefore, will deny Plaintiff’s r—qu—st.3 If Plaintiff believes the Court has jurisdiction over the Colorado employer, it can file a motion with the Court that shows jurisdiction. Alternatively, Plaintiff could r—gist—r th— Court’s original ju–gm—nt with th— United States District Court for the District of Colorado4 and seek the writ there. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s r—qu—st—– writ of garnishment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 2, 2018 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 2 Doc. 21. Doc. 37. 3 See Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 38 (2014) (holding that, generally, a corporation is only subject to the general jurisdiction of the courts of the state where it is incorporated or principally conducts business). 4 28 U.S.C. § 1963. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.