Pinkston v. Kelly, No. 1:2013cv02220 - Document 8 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's R&R and agrees that the petition should be dismissed as time-barred. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. # 7 ) and DISMISSES the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1 ). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/9/2014. (K,K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pinkston v. Kelly Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IKE PINKSTON Petitioner, vs. BENNIE KELLY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:13CV2220 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp (“R & R”) (Doc. # 7). The R&R recommends that Petitioner Ike Pinkston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1) be dismissed as time-barred. The deadline has long since passed for Petitioner to file written objections to the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file objections by the deadline constitutes a waiver of the right to obtain a de novo review of the R&R in the district court, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949 (6th Cir. 1981), and a waiver of the right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and agrees that the petition should be dismissed as time-barred. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. # 7) and DISMISSES the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Dan Aaron Polster May 9, 2014 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
