Libretti v. Woodson, No. 1:2013cv00932 - Document 42 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order denying plaintiff's 40 Motion to alter/amend the judgment dismissing the complaint for reasons accurately and succinctly stated in the opposition brief. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 1/27/2014. (S,J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Libretti v. Woodson Doc. 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH V. LIBRETTI, JR., Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN WOODSON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:13 CV 932 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is “Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to Alter or Amend this Court’s December 17, 2013 Order and Judgment Dismissing the Complaint.” (Doc #: 40 (“Motion”)). The Court has reviewed the Motion and Defendant’s Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion etc. (Doc #: 41 (“Opposition Brief.”)). The Court notes only that a review of the docket in this case shows that Plaintiff has needlessly taxed public and private resources in litigating this case.1 That practice in the district court ends today. Accordingly, for the reasons accurately and succinctly stated in the Opposition Brief, the Court DENIES the Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Dan A. Polster January 27, 2014 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge 1 See, for example, Plaintiff’s attempt to file five amended complaints and frivolous motions such as “Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss” (Doc #: 36). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
