Colosi v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., No. 1:2013cv00505 - Document 76 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order denying parties' cross motions for summary judgment 69 and 70 . Plaintiff filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Discovery before the dispositive motion deadline which the Court has not addressed. After revi ewing the of the materials submitted by the parties relative to Plaintiff's motion to compel 58 as well as Mr. Shannon's affidavit relative to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) motion, the Defendant is ordered to provide the personnel docum ents requested by Plaintiff in her Notice of Records Deposition and as detailed in Mr. Shannon's affidavit by January 28, 2014. Further, If Plaintiff still wants to depose Ms. Abraham and Mr. Roe, Defendant will make them available for deposition during the time frame of January 30-February 7, 2014. Trial continued to 2/5/2014 at 08:30 AM. The parties trial briefs and other materials are due on Tuesday, February 4, 2014. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Colosi v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. Doc. 76 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRENDA C. COLOSI, Plaintiff, vs. JONES LANG LaSALLE AMERICANS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1: 13 CV 505 JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (ECF #69 and #70). In addition, in her opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff has made a Rule 56(d) motion to defer ruling on Defendant’s motion until Plaintiff has been permitted to obtain discovery to support her claims. While the Court recognizes Defendant’s assertion that a Rule 56(d) motion may be denied where the moving party has already filed for summary judgment, the circumstances here require a different result. Review of both motions for summary judgment reveal that factual disputes exist that cannot be fairly resolved until Plaintiff is allowed basic discovery. As such, both motions for summary judgment are denied. Plaintiff filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Discovery before the dispositive motion deadline which the Court has not addressed. After reviewing the of the materials submitted by the parties relative to Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF #58) as well as Mr. Shannon’s affidavit relative to Plaintiff’s Rule 56(d) motion, the Defendant is ordered to provide the personnel documents requested by Plaintiff in her Notice of Records Deposition and as detailed in Mr. Shannon’s affidavit by January 28, 2014. Further, If Plaintiff still wants to depose Ms. Abraham Dockets.Justia.com and Mr. Roe, Defendant will make them available for deposition during the time frame of January 30-February 7, 2014. Trial in this matter is continued to Wednesday February 5, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. The parties trial briefs and other materials are due on Tuesday, February 4, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. _/s/Donald C. Nugent__________ Donald C. Nugent UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED:_January 22, 2014____
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
