Reddy v. Kelly, No. 1:2012cv00057 - Document 14 (N.D. Ohio 2014)

Court Description: ENTERED IN ERROR, PLEASE DISREGARD Memorandum Opinion and Order: This Court, having issued its Memorandum of Opinion and Order accepting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baughman, Jr. (Doc. 11 ) which recommends dismissal an d denial of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pending before the Court, hereby enters judgment for respondent. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/10/14. (LC,S) re 13 Modified on 9/11/2014 (LC,S).

Download PDF

Reddy v. Kelly Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Joseph David Reddy, Petitioner, vs. Bennie Kelly, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:12 CV 57 JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN Judgment Entry This Court, having issued its Memorandum of Opinion and Order accepting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baughman, Jr. (Doc. 11) which recommends dismissal and denial of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pending before the Court, hereby enters judgment for respondent. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/10/14 /s/ Patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.