Hommes v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2012cv00012 - Document 20 (N.D. Ohio 2012)
Court Description: FILED IN ERROR -Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the re 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and dismissing this matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Judge John R. Adams on 11/14/12. (K,C) See corrected Doc. # 22 ; Modified on 11/14/2012 (K,C).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hommes v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STACY HOMMES Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.1:12cv12 JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and this Court referred the case to the Magistrate Judge for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for want of prosecution because Plaintiff failed to file her brief on the merits within the time frame set by the Court. Doc 19. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Plaintiff failed to file objections. Thus, any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/14/12 /s/ John R. Adams_______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
