De Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2011cv02285 - Document 20 (N.D. Ohio 2012)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the re 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and reversing the decision of the Commissioner. The casue is remanded for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 7/31/12. (K,C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
De Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FELICITA DE NUNEZ, Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ) CASE NO. 1:11CV2285 ) ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER ) ) ) The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and this Court referred the case to the Magistrate Judge for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 18) recommending that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand the matter. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. Defendant has filed a notice that he does not intend to object to the Magistrate’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED for further consideration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2012 /s/ John R. Adams_______________ JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
