Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. Haldex Brake Products Corporation, No. 1:2009cv00176 - Document 123 (N.D. Ohio 2010)

Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order This matter is before the Court as a result of a discovery dispute between the parties. The Court has conducted an in camera review of a previously identified set of documents to determine whether privilege has be en waived with respect to these documents, or whether they are protected from production based on the attorney work product doctrine or other privilege. Having reviewed all of the documents at issue, the Court finds that documents 46 - 49 , 72 , a nd 75 - 76 (from Haldex's privilege log), are all protected by the work product doctrine or are otherwise privileged and need not be turned over to the Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. Related documents 47 , 48 . Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 8/27/10. (K,K)

Download PDF
Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. Haldex Brake Products Corporation Doc. 123 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Haldex Brake Products Corp., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:09 CV 176 JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court as a result of a discovery dispute between the parties. The Court has conducted an in camera review of a previously identified set of documents to determine whether privilege has been waived with respect to these documents, or whether they are protected from production based on the attorney work product doctrine or other privilege. Having reviewed all of the documents at issue, the Court finds that documents 46-49, 72, and 7576 (from Haldex’s privilege log), are all protected by the work product doctrine or are otherwise privileged and need not be turned over to the Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Donald C. Nugent Donald C. Nugent United Stated District Judge Date: August 27, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.