Brown v. Hudson, No. 1:2007cv01333 - Document 17 (N.D. Ohio 2008)

Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order. On March 27, 2008 this Court entered an Order granting petitioner's motion to hold this action in abeyance re 16 in order to give him the opportunity to procure and submit evidence in support of his claim o f actual innocence. The abeyance period expired on August 1, 2008, and petitioner has failed to submit any additional evidence. This action, therefore, is restored to the active docket, and will be considered upon the record as it now stands. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 8/8/08. (W,Jo)

Download PDF
Brown v. Hudson Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Larry Brown, Sr., Petitioner v. Stuart Hudson, Warden, Respondent : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:07CV1333 Judge Dan A. Polster Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On March 27, 2008 this Court entered an Order granting petitioner’s motion to hold this action in abeyance in order to give him the opportunity to procure and submit evidence in support of his claim of actual innocence. The abeyance period expired on August 1, 2008, and petitioner has failed to submit any additional evidence. This action, therefore, is restored to the active docket, and will be considered upon the record as it now stands. IT IS SO ORDERED s/DAVID S. PERELMAN United States Magistrate Judge DATE: August 8, 2008 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.