MCDOUGALD v. KERSEY et al, No. 1:2020cv00666 - Document 72 (M.D.N.C. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 11/21/2022, that the Recommendation, Doc. 56 , is NOT ADOPTED for the reasons stated in this Order. The defendant Jessica Sadovnikov's motion f or summary judgment, Doc. 29 , is GRANTED as to the plaintiff Barbara McDougald's due process claims but DENIED as to all other claims. The defendants Sheriff Kersey and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland's motion for summary judgmen t, Doc. 31 , is GRANTED as to the plaintiff Barbara McDougald's Monell claim but DENIED as to all other claims. The plaintiff Barbara McDougald's motion to file additional evidence, Doc. 42 , is GRANTED. The plaintiff Barbara McDougald's motion to supplement the record, Doc. 64 , is GRANTED.(Taylor, Abby)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MCDOUGALD v. KERSEY et al Doc. 72 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 31 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 3 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 4 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 5 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 6 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 7 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 8 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 9 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 10 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 11 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 12 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 13 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 14 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 15 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 16 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 17 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 18 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 19 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 20 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 21 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 22 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 23 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 24 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 25 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 26 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 27 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 28 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 29 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 30 of 31 Case 1:20-cv-00666-CCE-JLW Document 72 Filed 11/21/22 Page 31 of 31
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
