SHOEMAKER v. SAUL, No. 1:2019cv00441 - Document 14 (M.D.N.C. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 8/31/2020; that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be REVERSED, and that the matte r be REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 40S(g). The Commissioner should be directed to remand the matter to the ALJ for further consideration of Plaintiff's claim in light of the above recommendation. Defendant& #039;s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 12 ] should be DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 10 ] should be GRANTED to the extent set out herein. However, to the extent Plaintiff seeks an immediate award of benefits, her Motion is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)

Download PDF
SHOEMAKER v. SAUL Doc. 14 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 16 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 3 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 4 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 5 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 6 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 7 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 8 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 9 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 10 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 11 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 12 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 13 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 14 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 15 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-00441-TDS-JEP Document 14 Filed 08/31/20 Page 16 of 16

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.