-WWD LARROWE v. BANK OF THE CAROLINAS et al, No. 1:2010cv00378 - Document 162 (M.D.N.C. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 05/16/2011. This matter is before the court on a motion by Defendant Bank of the Carolinas to dismiss with prejudice certain counterclaims (docket no. [9 6]) filed by the Bank against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See FED. R CIV. P. 41(c). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion, and the matter is ripe for disposition. Because Plaintiff does not oppose the moti on, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the court grant the Bank's motion to dismiss with prejudice the following allegations and claims against Plaintiff (docket no. 96 ), as alleged in the Bank's First Amendment of Counterclaim (docket no. 77 ): paragraph 8(e); Count III(tortious interference with regulatory relationships) (paragraphs 18-22); and Count VI (unfair and deceptive trade practices) (paragraphs 32-39).(Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MICHAEL D. LARROWE, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF THE CAROLINAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION 1:10CV378 This matter is before the court on a motion by Defendant Bank of the Carolinas to dismiss with prejudice certain counterclaims (docket no. 96) filed by the Bank against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See FED. R CIV. P. 41(c). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion, and the matter is ripe for disposition. Because Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the court grant the Bank s motion to dismiss with prejudice the following allegations and claims against Plaintiff (docket no. 96), as alleged in the Bank s First Amendment of Counterclaim (docket no. 77): paragraph 8(e); Count III (tortious interference with regulatory relationships) (paragraphs 18-22); and Count VI (unfair and deceptive trade practices) (paragraphs 32-39). _____________________________ WALLACE W. DIXON United States Magistrate Judge May 16, 2011

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.