Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, No. 7:2014cv00185 - Document 325 (E.D.N.C. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 125 Motion in Limine as it relates to the topics stipulated by the parties. All topics that were not agreed upon by the parties were ruled on by the court as the issues arose at trial. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/6/2019. (Herrmann, L.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC Doc. 325 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE No. 7:14-cv-000185-BR ANNJEANETTE GILLIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, d/b/a SMITHFIELD HOG PRODUCTION DIVISION, Defendant. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion in Limine. ECF No. 125. In the plaintiffs’ proposed stipulation, they set out the topics they wanted the parties to agree on or, in the alternative, the court to rule on. exhibit. 1. See ECF No. 125, The defendant filed a Response in Partial Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion in Limine. 141. ECF No. The topics raised in plaintiffs’ motion have either been stipulated by the parties or have been decided by the court’s written or oral Orders as the issues arose at trial. Therefore, the plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED, as it relates to the topics stipulated by the parties. All topics that were not agreed upon by the parties were ruled on by the court as the issues arose at trial. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th of March, 2019 ENTER:
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
