Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al, No. 5:2008cv00463 - Document 1186 (E.D.N.C. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER denying 943 Motion to Dismiss; denying 950 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 952 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 954 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 960 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 1119 Motion to Dismiss; denying 1121 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 1123 Motion to Dismiss; denying 1125 Motion to Dismiss; denying 1127 Motion to Dismiss for F ailure to State a Claim; and denying 1129 Motion to Dismiss - The court will seperately enter an order regarding planning and scheduling with respect to claims by PCS Phosphate against third-party defendants. Motion to Dismiss at 1129 is denied without prejudice for renewal at the close of discovery or before trial. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/27/2013. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/27/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al Doc. 1186 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.