Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al, No. 5:2008cv00460 - Document 1189 (E.D.N.C. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER denying 946 Motion to Dismiss; denying 953 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 955 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 957 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 963 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 1121 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 1123 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 1125 Motion to Dismiss; denying 1127 Motion to Dismiss; denying [1 129] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying and 1131 Motion to Dismiss - The court will seperately enter an order regarding planning and scheduling with respect to claims by PCS Phosphate against third-party defendants. Motion to Dismiss at 1131 is denied without prejudice for renewal at the close of discovery or before trial. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/27/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al Doc. 1189 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.