Smith v. Astrue, No. 5:2008cv00332 - Document 14 (E.D.N.C. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since July 3, 2003, the date the application for supplemental security income was filed. The component of the Socia l Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the non-disability requirements for these payments, and if eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made. A determination to appoint a representative payee to manage payments in the claimants interest is recommended. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk on 8/26/2010. (Sawyer, D.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
S m i t hv .A s t r u e D o A O 4 5 0 ( R e v . 5/85) United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION DEBORAH SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 5:08-CV-332-D ) ) ) ) Decision by the Court: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since July 3, 2003, the date the application for supplemental security income was filed. The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the non-disability requirements for these payments, and if eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made. A determination to appoint a representative payee to manage payments in the claimant’s interest is recommended. THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, AUGUST 26, 2010 WITH A COPY TO: Elizabeth F. Lunn (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Eileen A. Farmer (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) August 26, 2010 Date DENNIS P. IAVARONE, Clerk Eastern District of North Carolina /s/ Debby Sawyer (By) Deputy Clerk Raleigh, North Carolina Page 1 of 1 D o c
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
