Applewhite v. Sheahan et al, No. 6:2008cv06045 - Document 36 (W.D.N.Y. 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER denying 34 Motion for injunctive relief; denying 35 Motion for injunctive relief.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 12/1/09. (KAP)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRIS APPLEWHITE 99-A-6852, Plaintiff, DECISION & ORDER -vs08-CV-6045-CJS-MWP CAPTAIN MICHEAL SHEAHAN, et al., Defendants. CHRIS APPLEWHITE 99-A-6852, Plaintiff, 04-CV-6602-CJS-MWP -vsMICHAEL MCGINNIS, Superintendent, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff has sent correspondence to the Court dated November 23 and November 24, 2009, seeking either a temporary restraining order ( TRO ) or preliminary injunction ( PI ) against Sergeant L. Dick ( Dick ) and Deputy Superintendent for Security Gary W. Richards ( Richards ). Plaintiff alleges, and encloses documents showing, that Dick recommended that Plaintiff be deprived of all paper as a result of continually threatening to cover his cell window with paper on November 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, 2009. Richards approved of the recommendation and, on November 24, 2009, issued a memorandum to Plaintiff informing him that he was not in compliance with Directive 4913 Inmate Property Limits and would have to divest himself of two draft bags of papers in order to come into compliance with that directive. Neither Richards nor Dick is a party to either of Plaintiff s lawsuits pending in this Court. A court must have in personam jurisdiction over a party before it can validly enter even an interlocutory injunction against him. 7 Moore's Federal Practice, A. 65.04(3); see 601 West 26 Corp. v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 291 F.Supp. 882, 895 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd, 420 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1969). Visual Sciences, Inc. v. Integrated Communications Inc., 660 F.2d 56, 59 (2d Cir. 1981). Here, Plaintiff has not even alleged a prima facie showing of in personam jurisdiction over Richards or Dick, and even if he had done so, that alone would be inadequate for the Court to consider a request for injunctive relief. Id. Consequently, Plaintiff s letter applications dated November 23 and November 24, 2009, for a TRO or PI are denied for lack of in personam jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2009 Rochester, New York ENTER: /s/ Charles J. Siragusa CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
