Nash v. Harris et al, No. 1:2016cv00717 - Document 20 (W.D.N.Y. 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer's Report and Recommendation 19 . This case is dismissed under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. A copy of this entry and the Order have been mailed to Reeseie E. Nash, 126 A, Jasper Parish Dr., Buffalo, NY 14207. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/30/17. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Nash v. Harris et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK REESEIE E. NASH, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 16-CV-717 v. CHIEF HARRIS, et al., Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On July 21, 2017, Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19), recommending that this case be dismissed under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Roemer’s Report and Recommendation, this case is dismissed under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. __s/Richard J. Arcara__________ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: August 30, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
