Scull v. Hennegan et al, No. 1:2015cv00309 - Document 65 (W.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy's Report and Recommendation 64 . Pro se defendant John Bartolomei's motion for summary judgment 51 is granted in part, dismissing plaintiff's state law conspi racy claim against the defendant, but is otherwise denied, without prejudice. The case remains referred to Magistrate Judge McCarthy. A copy of this Decision and Order has been mailed to John T. Scull, 422 10th Street, Niagara Falls, NY 14303. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/31/17. (LAS)

Download PDF
Scull v. Hennegan et al Doc. 65 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN T. SCULL, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 15-CV-309-A v. PATRICK K. HENNEGAN, ROGER TREVINO and JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI, BRIAN DEL PORTO, NIAGARA FALLS REDEVELOPMENT LLC, 11TH STREET PROPERTIES LLC, CLARKSVILLE LAND COMPANY LLC, HOWARD MILSTEIN (Owner NFR), ANTHONY BERGAMO (President NFR), CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK, THOMAS G. EWING, Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On May 4, 2017, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 64), recommending that pro se defendant John Bartolomei’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 51) be granted in part, dismissing plaintiff’s state law conspiracy claim against him, but otherwise denied, without prejudice. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s Report and Recommendation, pro se defendant John Dockets.Justia.com Bartolomei’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part, dismissing plaintiff’s state law conspiracy claim against the defendant, but is otherwise denied, without prejudice. The case is remains referred to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings consistent to the Court’s prior Text Order Referring Case at Dkt. No. 8. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____Richard J. Arcara____________ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: May 31, 2017 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.