Staufenberger v. Colvin, No. 1:2015cv00254 - Document 18 (W.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy's Report and Recommendation 17 . Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings 8 is granted, and the Acting Commissioner's motion for similar relief 13 is denie d. This case is remanded to the Acting Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 6/1/17. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Download PDF
Staufenberger v. Colvin Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHERRY S. STAUFENBERGER, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 15-CV-254A v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17), recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 8) be granted, and that the Acting Commissioner’s motion for similar relief (Dkt. No. 13) be denied. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and the Acting Commissioner’s motion for similar relief is denied. This case is remanded to the Acting Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s Report and Recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____Richard J. Arcara____________ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: June 1, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.