Henderson v. Annucci et al, No. 1:2014cv00445 - Document 70 (W.D.N.Y. 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy's Report and Recommendation 69 . Defendants' motion to dismiss 67 is granted. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/23/17. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Henderson v. Annucci et al Doc. 70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THOMAS ADAM HENDERSON, #14-B-1931, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 14-CV-445A v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, VERNON J. FONDA, MARK L. BRADT, WILLIAM HUGHES, WILLIAM DUNFORD, JUSTIN HOINSKI, BRYAN NABB, Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 26, 2017, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69), recommending that the defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 67) be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s Report and Recommendation, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. ____Richard J. Arcara____________ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: May 23, 2017
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
