Fraiser v. Astrue, No. 1:2012cv01179 - Document 20 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's counsel's 14 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $2,080; DIRECTING Plaintiff's counsel to refund the $986.82 EAJA fee to Plaintiff within 14 days of the entry date of this Decision and Order if he has not already done so. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 12/17/2018. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP -
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Fraiser v. Astrue Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAGAN FRAISER, Plaintiff, v. DECISION AND ORDER 12-CV-1179S COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Plaintiff Pagan Fraiser is a prevailing party in this social security benefits action. Presently before this Court is Plaintiff=s counsel=s Motion for Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. ' 406 (b)(1)(A). (Docket No. 14.) Defendant does not oppose the motion. (Docket No. 19.) Forty-two U.S.C. ' 406 (b)(1)(A) provides as follows: Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(i) of this title, but subject to subsection (d) of this section, certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits. In case of any such judgment, no other fee may be payable or certified for payment for such representation except as provided in this paragraph. Plaintiff was awarded $69,504 in past-due benefits. (Affirmation of William C. Bernhardi (ABernhardi Aff.@), Docket No. 24-2, & 2 and Exhibit 2.) Plaintiff=s counsel seeks $2,080 in fees, consistent with the contingent-fee agreement that provides for Dockets.Justia.com attorney fees not to exceed 25% of any recovery. (Bernhardi Aff., & 2 and Exhibit 3.) Having thoroughly reviewed counsel=s fee request and supporting documentation, this Court finds that the requested fee is reasonable based on counsel=s experience in social security law, the character of the representation provided, and the favorable results achieved. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808, 1122 S. Ct. 1817, 152 L. Ed. 2d 996 (2002). Moreover, there is no indication that this fee is a windfall. Id. Plaintiff=s counsel=s $2,080 fee request is therefore granted under 42 U.S.C. ' 406 (b)(1)(A). By stipulation approved and ordered on September 12, 2013, this Court previously awarded Plaintiff=s counsel $986.82 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (AEAJA@), 28 U.S.C. ' 2412 (d). (Docket Nos. 9, 10.) Because the fee granted above exceeds the EAJA fee, Plaintiff=s counsel must refund the EAJA fee to Plaintiff. See Wells v. Bowen, 855 F.2d 37, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff=s counsel=s Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $2,080 under 42 U.S.C. ' 406(b)(1)(A) (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Plaintiff=s counsel is directed to refund the $986.82 EAJA fee to Plaintiff within 14 days of the entry date of this Decision and Order if he has not already done so. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2018 Buffalo, New York /s/William M. Skretny WILLIAM M. SKRETNY United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
