Driscoll v. Rydirick et al, No. 1:2011cv00674 - Document 41 (W.D.N.Y. 2013)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ASSIGNING Attorneys John G. Horn and Denise M. Brown, pro bono to represent Plaintiff in this case; FURTHER, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED forward this Order and the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses to Mr. Horn and Ms. Brown. A Status Conference is set for 7/25/2013 at 9:00 AM before William M. Skretny, Chief Judge. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 6/24/2013. (CLERK TO FOLLOW UP). (CMD)

Download PDF
Driscoll v. Rydirick et al Doc. 41 -PS-O- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DARON DRISCOLL, Plaintiff, DECISION and ORDER 11-CV-0674S -vOFFICER RYDIRICK, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). This Court is required to see that all litigants receive proper representation of counsel under the criteria set forth in Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1989), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986). In addition, courts have the inherent authority to assign counsel to represent private indigent litigants. See In re Smiley, 36 N.Y.2d 433, 438 (1975). Additionally, each lawyer especially those who are admitted to practice in federal court and who therefore are in a position to reap the benefits of such practice has a professional obligation to provide pro bono services for the poor. See New York Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1. In addition, Rule 83.1(f) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows: Every member of the bar of this Court who maintains, or whose firm maintains, an office in this District, shall be available upon the Court s request for appointment to represent or assist in the representation of indigent parties. Appointments under this Rule shall be made in a manner such that no Member shall be requested to accept more than one appointment during any twelve-month period. Dockets.Justia.com It is in this spirit that the Court assigns John G. Horn, Esq. and Denise M. Brown, Esq. of Harter Secrest and Emery LLP, 12 Fountain Plaza, Suite 400, Buffalo, New York 14202, pro bono, to faithfully and diligently represent plaintiff in this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this order and the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses Incurred by Court Appointed Counsel to Mr. Horn and Ms. Brown.1 The Chief Judge of the Court will also issue an Order directing PACER to waive its fees so both pro bono counsel can access and print, at no cost to them or their firm, any other documents filed herein that they may need. Counsel is directed to appear at the next scheduled conference in this matter on July 25, 2013 at 9:00 am at the Buffalo Courtroom, Ninth Floor, United States Courthouse, 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, New York 14202. As discussed with Defendant s attorney and Plaintiff at the last status, the attorneys in this case are encouraged to contact each other in advance of the July 25, 2013 status conference. SO ORDERED Dated: June 24, 2013 Buffalo, New York s/William M. Skretny WILLIAM M. SKRETNY Chief Judge United States District Court 1 This information and the forms are also available on the Court s web site at the Attorney Information link from the home page located at: http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov//pro-bono-program-district-court-fund. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.