Yeger et al v. The East Ramapo Central School District, No. 7:2021cv06822 - Document 26 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Court Description: CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 25 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of The East Ramapo Central School District against Elana L. Yeger, Itamar Yeger. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Or der dated November 7, 2022, The Parents' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The District's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, the decision of the state review officer is affirmed with respect to both the 2019-2020 a nd 2020-2021 school years. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 11/7/2022) (tp)

Download PDF
Yeger et al v. The East Ramapo Central School District Doc. 26 Case 7:21-cv-06822-VB Document 26 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X ELANA L. YEGER and ITAMAR YEGER, individually and on behalf of J.Y., Plaintiffs, 21 CIVIL 6822 (VB) JUDGMENT -against- THE EAST RAMAPO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 7, 2022, The Parents' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The District's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, the decision of the state review officer is affirmed with respect to both the 20192020 and 2020-2021 school years. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 9, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK _________________________ Clerk of Court BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.