Panchishak v. County of Rockland, New York et al, No. 7:2020cv10095 - Document 26 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)

Court Description: MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying 23 Motion to Reassign Case. ENDORSEMENT:The Court denies Plaintiff's motion. There is no basis on which the Plaintiff makes this motion. "This case was randomly reassigned to [the Court] under Rule 4 of the Rules for the Division of Business Among District Judges (RDB). 'As their preamble makes clear, the RDB rules are adopted for the internal management of the case load of the court and shall not be deemed to vest any rights in litigants or th eir attorneys.'" Moskovits v. Fed. Republic of Brazil, No. 21-CV-4309, 2021 WL 4263069, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021) (quoting United States v. Donziger, Nos. 19-CR-561, 11-CV-691, 2020 WL 2216556, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2020)); see als o United States v. Brennerman, No. 15-CV-0070, 2017 WL 3421397, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2017) ("First, the RDB vest no rights in litigants-they are for internal management only."). "As the Second Circuit and numerous decisions of t his Court and the Eastern District of New York have held, that fact alone dooms this aspect of [Plaintiff's] motion." Brennerman, 2017 WL 3421397, at *10 (collecting cases); see also Sahu v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 04-CV-8825, 2010 WL 53 2307, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2010). Citing no authority to reassign this case, the Court must deny the motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (Dkt. No. 23), and to mail a copy of this decision to Plaintiff. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/14/21) (yv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.