Graham et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation et al, No. 7:2018cv04196 - Document 43 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By Opinion and Order dated September 23, 2020, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 33, 38.) The Court also granted Plaintiffs' request to amend the Complaint. (Dkt. No. 38. ) The Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 23, 2020. (Dkt. No. 40.) Defendants filed a Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 41.) The Court dismisses Defendants' pending Motion To Dismiss wi thout prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's individual rules. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (Id.) SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: 41 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. filed by OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, HSBC Mortgage Corporation. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/8/2020) (jca)

Download PDF
Graham et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation et al Doc. 43 Case 7:18-cv-04196-KMK Document 43 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GRAHAM, Plaintiff, 18-CV-4196 (KMK) v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ET AL, ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: By Opinion and Order dated September 23, 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 33, 38.) The Court also granted Plaintiffs’ request to amend the Complaint. (Dkt. No. 38.) The Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 23, 2020. (Dkt. No. 40.) Defendants filed a Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 41.) The Court dismisses Defendants’ pending Motion To Dismiss without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s individual rules. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (Id.) SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2020 White Plains, New York KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.