Shtilman v. Baker et al, No. 7:2014cv06589 - Document 63 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 59 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel. filed by Sergey Shtilman. Therefore, because the Court does not find any circumstances which warrant the appointment of pro bono counsel at this time, Plaintiff 9;s motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal at a later stage in the proceedings. Additionally, Plaintiff's application requesting copies of the Opposition papers is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send cop ies of the documents at ECF Nos. 51, 52, and 57 to Sergey Shtilman, 98-A-1497, Elmira Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 500, 1879 Davis Street, Elmira, NY 14901-500. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No 59. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 12/15/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rj) Modified on 12/18/2017 (rj).

Download PDF
Shtilman v. Baker et al Doc. 63 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.