Securities and Exchange Commission v. weiss, No. 1:2022cv08064 - Document 8 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL WEISS: IT IS HERBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("the Exc hange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any nation securities exchange, in con nection with the purchase or sale of any security, as further set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $10,286, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct allege d in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $3,328. The Court finds that sending the disgorged funds to the United States Treasury, as ordered below, is consistent with equitable principles. The Court further imposes a civil penalty in the amount of $10,286 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant shall satisfy these obligations by paying $23,900 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment, as further set forth. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. The Clerk of C ourt is directed to terminate the Consent Motion pending at Dkt. No. 3, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: 3 CONSENT MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/28/2022) (mml)

Download PDF

Securities and Exchange Commission v. weiss Doc. 8 Case 1:22-cv-08064-PGG Document 8 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-8064 (PGG) v. MICHAEL WEISS, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL WEISS The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint, and Defendant Michael Weiss having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph IV); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HERBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any nation securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of material fact or to omit to state a material fact Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-08064-PGG Document 8 Filed 09/28/22 Page 2 of 4 necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys: and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $10,286, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $3,328. The Court finds that sending the disgorged funds to the United States Treasury, as ordered below, is consistent with equitable principles. The Court further imposes a civil penalty in the amount of $10,286 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant shall satisfy these obligations by paying $23,900 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 2 Case 1:22-cv-08064-PGG Document 8 Filed 09/28/22 Page 3 of 4 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Michael Weiss as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no party of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders issues in this action. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set for therein. 3 Case 1:22-cv-08064-PGG Document 8 Filed 09/28/22 Page 4 of 4 IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the Consent Motion pending at Dkt. No. 3, and to close this case. Dated: New York, New York September 28, 2022 SO ORDERED. _____________________ Paul G. Gardephe United States District Judge 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.