Hernandez Linar et al v. El Valle 794 Rest., Corp. et al, No. 1:2022cv03102 - Document 31 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by Kevi Comas, El Valle 794 Rest., Corp., Southern Blvd's Cafe Corp., Ana Cedano, Yreno Cedano. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED as frivolous. T hat said, the Court urges Plaintiff to review the purported evidence submitted by Defendants to ensure that the claims that Plaintiff is pursuing have merit. The Court has not reviewed the purported evidence and intimates no views on the merits of Pl aintiff's claims at this time, but it notes that continued pursuit of plainly meritless claims can result in sanctions. See, e.g., Galin v. Hamada, 283 F. Supp. 3d 189, 203-04 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (Furman, J.) (imposing Rule 11 sanctions where Plaint iff, at the end of fact discovery, "knew... that their allegations on the central (and dispositive) issue in the case were 'utterly lacking in support'" but nevertheless continued litigation (citing cases)), aff'd, 753 F. App 'x 3 (2d Cir. 2018). Defendants shall answer the Complaint within two weeks of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and the parties shall comply with all of the deadlines in the Court's prior Order of April 15, 2022, see ECF No. 12 , including scheduling a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Netburn. The initial pretrial conference, scheduled for June 28, 2022, is rescheduled to July 12, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/21/2022) (kv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hernandez Linar et al v. El Valle 794 Rest., Corp. et al Doc. 31 Case 1:22-cv-03102-JMF Document 31 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : PRISCILIANO HERNANDEZ LINAR, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : : EL VALLE 794 REST., CORP. et al., : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X 22-CV-3102 (JMF) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On June 15, 2022, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint on the ground that “Plaintiff’s version of the facts are 100% inaccurate,” pointing to “time and pay records and wage notices, for the entire relevant period.” See ECF No. 27, at 2. A Court considering a motion to dismiss, however, is limited to “the facts alleged in the complaint, documents attached to the complaint as exhibits, and documents incorporated by reference in the complaint,” as well as any documents which the complaint relies upon so heavily that they are “integral to the complaint.” DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C., 622 F.3d 104, 111 (2d Cir. 2010). Defendants’ motion to dismiss is based entirely on documents and other extrinsic evidence that the Court may not consider at the motion to dismiss stage. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED as frivolous. That said, the Court urges Plaintiff to review the purported evidence submitted by Defendants to ensure that the claims that Plaintiff is pursuing have merit. The Court has not reviewed the purported evidence and intimates no views on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims at this time, but it notes that continued pursuit of plainly meritless claims can result in sanctions. See, e.g., Galin v. Hamada, 283 F. Supp. 3d 189, 203-04 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (Furman, J.) (imposing Rule 11 sanctions where Plaintiff, at the end of fact discovery, “knew . . . that their allegations on the central (and dispositive) issue in the case were ‘utterly lacking in support’” but nevertheless continued litigation (citing cases)), aff’d, 753 F. App’x 3 (2d Cir. 2018). Defendants shall answer the Complaint within two weeks of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and the parties shall comply with all of the deadlines in the Court’s prior Order of April 15, 2022, see ECF No. 12, including scheduling a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Netburn. The initial pretrial conference, scheduled for June 28, 2022, is rescheduled to July 12, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 21, 2022 New York, New York __________________________________ JESSE M. FURMAN United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
