Kramer et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al, No. 1:2021cv07121 - Document 59 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/9/2022) (vfr)

Download PDF
Kramer et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al Doc. 59 Case 1:21-cv-07121-DLC Document 59 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X : STEPHEN C. KRAMER et al., : : Plaintiffs, : -v: : PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., et al, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------- X 21cv7121 (DLC) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: On August 24, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a complaint in this Court asserting diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. On April 29, 2022, this case was transferred to this Court’s docket. On May 20, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a letter regarding the basis for their belief that diversity of citizenship exists but the letter was insufficient. On June 1, the plaintiffs filed a second letter to supplement the May 20 letter but the letter was again insufficient. On June 8, the plaintiffs filed a third letter to supplement the June 1 letter. “Federal courts have a duty to inquire into their subject matter jurisdiction.” D’Amico Dry Ltd. v. Primera Mar. (Hellas) Ltd., 756 F.3d 151, 161 (2d Cir. 2014). “If subject matter jurisdiction is lacking and no party has called the matter to the court’s attention, the court has the duty to dismiss the action sua sponte.” Fracasse v. People’s United Bank, 747 F.3d 141, 143 (2d Cir. 2014). “[W]hen a Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-07121-DLC Document 59 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 3 determination is made that no jurisdiction lies, the district court has no power to do anything but to strike the case from the docket.” W.G. v. Senatore, 18 F.3d 60, 64 (2d Cir. 1994) (citation omitted). The sole basis for federal jurisdiction asserted in the complaint was diversity of the parties. A limited liability company “takes the citizenship of each of its members” for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir. 2012). Like limited liability companies, the citizenship of limited partnerships is determined based on the citizenship of all of its partners. Americold Realty Trust v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 577 U.S. 378, 381 (2016). This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Diversity jurisdiction is unavailable because there is not complete diversity between the parties. Penske Truck Leasing Corporation has its principal place of business in Pennsylvania and is a member of two of the defendants: Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and PTL GP LLC. citizens of Pennsylvania. It is hereby 2 Penske The plaintiffs are also Case 1:21-cv-07121-DLC Document 59 Filed 06/09/22 Page 3 of 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.