Agbalenyo v. Evans et al, No. 1:2021cv03034 - Document 6 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the matter is summarily remanded to state court. Defendants' Notice of Removal is procedurally defective. Pursuant to section 1447(c), the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a certified copy of th is Opinion and Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/14/2021) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Agbalenyo v. Evans et al UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X : KOAMI AGBALENYO, : Plaintiff, : : -against: : KEVIN JAY EVANS, et al., : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------- X Doc. 6 21 Civ. 3034 (LGS) ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal on April 8, 2021. Dkt. No. 1. WHEREAS, the Notice of Removal failed to allege the citizenship of Defendant Kevin Jay Evans and the state of incorporation of Continental Logistics Services, both at the time of commencement of the action and the time of removal. See Dkt. No. 1. WHEREAS, a District Court may sua sponte remand a case for a procedural defect within thirty (30) days of the filing of the Notice of Removal. Mitskovski v. Buffalo & Fort Erie Pub. Bridge Auth., 435 F.3d 127, 131 (2d Cir. 2006); accord Banks v. Steiger, No. 21 Civ. 1343, 2021 WL 634144, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2021). WHEREAS, a Notice of Removal should allege the citizenship of the parties both at the time of the commencement of the action and at the time of the Notice of Removal. “The general rule is when, as in this case, diversity is the sole basis for asserting removal jurisdiction, diversity must exist both at the time the original action is filed in state court and at the time removal is sought to federal court.” Adrian Family Partners I, L.P. v. ExxonMobil Corp., 79 Fed. Appx. 489, 491 (2d Cir. 2003); see also United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 919 v. CenterMark Properties Meriden Square, Inc., 30 F.3d 298, 301 (2d Cir. 1994). WHEREAS, “[c]itizenship for diversity purposes depends on domicile, not residency,” Henry v. Gershan, 2020 WL 7625164, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2020), and “residence alone is Dockets.Justia.com insufficient to establish domicile,” Van Buskirk v. United Grp. of Cos., Inc., 935 F.3d 49, 54 (2d Cir. 2019). It is hereby ORDERED that the matter is summarily remanded to state court. Defendants’ Notice of Removal is procedurally defective. Pursuant to section 1447(c), the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a certified copy of this Opinion and Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close the case. Dated: April 14, 2020 New York, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
