Bey v. Trump et al, No. 1:2020cv05574 - Document 8 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to restore the Complaint to the calendar after a determination on the validity of Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 filed by Messiah Ali Bey, 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Order of Dismiss al filed by Messiah Ali Bey. Pending before this Court is pro se Plaintiff's motions for reconsideration. On July 27 2020, the Court dismissed the instant action sua sponte on the basis that the action was barred by presidential an d sovereign immunity and thus frivolous, and denied Plaintiff leave to amend on the basis of futility. Bey v. Trump, No. 20 Civ. 5574 (ER), 2020 WL 4340612 (S.D.N.Y. July 27, 2020). On August 17, Plaintiff filed a motion to "restore the c omplaint to the calendar." See Doc. 6. On September 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) for reconsideration. See Doc. 7. For the reasons set forth in the Court's July 27 Order, Plaintiff's motions are denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 6, and 7. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/24/2020) (mro)