R&G Enterprises, Inc. v. Choi et al, No. 1:2019cv11699 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER adopting 34 Report and Recommendations. Careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report reveals that there is no facial error in their conclusions. The Report, which is incorporated by reference herein, is adopted without modification. The motion for default judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F. 3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Small v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15,16 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). The Court therefore declines to issue a certificate of appealability, and certifies that any appeal from this order would not be take n in in good faith;therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/7/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
R&G Enterprises, Inc. v. Choi et al Doc. 39 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.