Rudani v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al, No. 1:2019cv06741 - Document 88 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: re: 58 MOTION to Strike Document No. [49, 50-1 to 50-3] Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Strike the Extrinsic Evidence and Related Arguments That Federico Tovar Submitted with His Motion to Dismiss filed by Ja ysukh Rudani, 48 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federico Tovar, 54 MOTION to Strike Document No. [52, 53-1 to 53-23] Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Strike the Extrinsic Evidence and Related Arguments That Defendants Ideanomics, Inc., Bruno W u, Bing Yang, and Robert Benya Submitted with Their Motion to Dism filed by Jaysukh Rudani, 51 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bruno Wu, Ideanomics, Inc., Bing Yang, Robert Benya. Plaintiff's motions to strike, (ECF No. 54 and 58), are DENIED. De fendant Tovar's motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 48), is GRANTED. Defendant Benya's motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 51), is GRANTED, to the extent that Count I of Plaintiff's amended complaint as to Benya is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/25/2020) (ama) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.