Harbus v. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc., No. 1:2019cv06124 - Document 28 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. For the reasons set forth above, the Manhattan Institute's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 19, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/27/2020) (mro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com OPINION AND ORDER I. Harbus v. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. 1 Doc. 28 Id Id The new Tappan Zee shows the best and the Worst of Cuomo Id Id Id Id Id Id Id Id See id See id II. Ashcroft v. Iqbal Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly Id. Twombly Id. Twombly In re Elevator Antitrust Litig. Twombly Sikhs for Justice v. Nath Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of Darien Halebian v. Berv Nielsen v. Rabin see also Twombly Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. III. DISCUSSION et seq. Toward a Fair Use Standard see Cariou v. Prince cert. denied Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust Id. Id. Id. Blanch v. Koons Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey McKenna v. Wright Swatch Grp. Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P. NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Inst. cert. denied Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. See, e.g. Yang v. Mic Network, Inc. see also Clark v. Transp. Alts., Inc. Am. Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc. always Id. see also Bill Graham Archives IV. CONCLUSION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
