Red Fort Capital, Inc. v. Guardhouse Productions LLC et al, No. 1:2019cv00686 - Document 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER re: 143 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 124 Memorandum & Opinion: On Tuesday, September 29, 2020, the Court held a hearing on pending matters and motions in this case. Then-pending before the Court was defendant Surya Iacono's m otion to reconsider the Court's August 13, 2019 Opinion and Order (the "August 13 Opinion") insofar as it denied her motion to dismiss the complaint against her for insufficient service of process, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5), Fed. R. Ci v. P. As stated on the record, Iacono's motion to reconsider pursuant to Local Rule 6.3 is untimely. Iacono had 14 days from entry of the Court's August 13 Opinion to move for reconsideration. Rule 6.3, Local Rules of the United States Dist rict Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. However, Iacono did not move for reconsideration until September 9, 2019, well after the 14-day time period elapsed. (See Doc 143.) Therefore, her motion for reconsideration is denied as untimely. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/29/2020) (jwh) Modified on 9/30/2020 (jwh).

Download PDF
Red Fort Capital, Inc. v. Guardhouse Productions LLC et al Doc. 236 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.