Lin v. Liberty Health Sciences Inc. et al, No. 1:2019cv00161 - Document 100 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all Class Members. This Judgme nt incorporates and makes a part hereof: (a) the Stipulation filed with the Court on January 8, 2021; and (b) the Notice and the Summary Notice, both of which were filed with the Court on January 8, 2021 and as further set forth in this Order. Lead Counsel is awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $600,000.00, and expenses in the amount of $28,818.78, such amounts to be paid out of the Settlement Fund immediately following entry of this Order. Class Counsel shall thereafter be solely responsible for allocating the attorneys' fees and expenses among other Plaintiff's counsel in the manner in which Class Counsel in good faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the i nitiation, prosecution, and resolution of the Actions. In the event that this Judgment does not become Final, and any portion of the Fee and Expense Award has already been paid from the Settlement Fund, Class Counsel and all other plaintiffs' counsel to whom Class Counsel has distributed payments shall within ten (10) business days of entry of the order rendering the Settlement and Judgment non-Final or notice of the Settlement being terminated or precludes the Effective Da te from occurring, refund the Settlement Fund the Fee and Expense Award paid to Class Counsel and, if applicable, distributed to other counsel. Lead Plaintiff Nancy Lin is awarded $5000, and Plaintiff Gilbert Lee Silverbird is awarded $3000 ($8,000 total), as Compensatory Awards for reasonable costs and expenses directly relating to the representation of the Class as provided in 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4), such amounts to be paid from the Settlement Fund upon the Effective Date of the Settlement. The Court directs immediate entry of this Judgment by the Clerk of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 11/16/2021) (tg) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lin v. Liberty Health Sciences Inc. et al Doc. 100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NANCY LIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/16/2021 Case No. 1:19-cv-00161-MKV-SLC Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY HEALTH SCIENCES INC., GEORGE SCORSIS, RENE GULLIVER, and VIC NEUFELD, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com WHEREAS, an action is pending before this Court entitled Lin v Liberty Health Sciences Inc., et al., 1:19-cv-00161-MKV-SLC (S.D.N.Y.) (“Litigation”); WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff Nancy Lin and Plaintiff Gilbert Lee Silverbird (together, “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and each of the Class Members, and Defendant Liberty Health Sciences Inc. (“Liberty”) have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement dated January 8, 2021 (the “Stipulation”), that provides for a complete dismissal with prejudice of the Action on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation, subject to the approval of this Court (the “Settlement”); WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined in this Judgment, the capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as they have in the Stipulation; WHEREAS, by Order dated July 8, 2021 (the “Preliminary Approval Order”), this Court: (a) preliminarily approved the Settlement; (b) certified the Class solely for purposes of effectuating the Settlement; (c) ordered that notice of the proposed Settlement be provided to potential Class Members; (d) provided Class Members with the opportunity either to exclude themselves from the Class or to object to the proposed Settlement; and (e) scheduled a hearing regarding final approval of the Settlement; WHEREAS, due and adequate notice has been given to the Settlement Class; WHEREAS, the Court conducted a hearing on November 15, 2021 (the “Settlement Hearing”) to consider, among other things, (a) whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class, and should therefore be approved; and (b) whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice; and 1 WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed and considered the Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held herein in connection with the Settlement, all oral and written comments received regarding the Settlement, and the record in the Action, and good cause appearing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all Class Members. 2. This Judgment incorporates and makes a part hereof: (a) the Stipulation filed with the Court on January 8, 2021; and (b) the Notice and the Summary Notice, both of which were filed with the Court on January 8, 2021. 3. The Court hereby affirms its determinations in the Preliminary Approval Order certifying, for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Action as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of the Settlement Class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased, held, or otherwise acquired the common stock of Liberty on the over-the-counter market in the United States between July 20, 2017 and December 6, 2018, both dates inclusive, and were allegedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are all named Defendants in the Litigation, the present and former officers and directors of Liberty and any subsidiary thereof, and the immediate family members, legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns of such excluded persons and any entity in which any such excluded person has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. [Also excluded from the Class are the persons and entities listed on Exhibit 1 hereto who or which are excluded from the Class.] 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Court hereby affirms its determinations in the Preliminary Approval 2 Order certifying Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for the Class and appointing Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Class. Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel have fairly and adequately represented the Class both in terms of litigating the Action and for purposes of entering into and implementing the Settlement and have satisfied the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4) and 23(g), respectively. 5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that: (a) the Stipulation and the Settlement described therein, are, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Class; (b) there was no collusion in connection with the Stipulation; (c) the Stipulation was the product of informed, arm’s-length negotiations among competent, able counsel; and (d) the record is sufficiently developed and complete to have enabled the Class representatives and Liberty to adequately evaluate and consider their positions. 6. Accordingly, the Court authorizes and directs implementation and performance of all the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, as well as the terms and provisions hereof. The Action and all claims contained therein, as well as all of the Released Claims, are dismissed with prejudice as against Defendants and the Released Parties. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Settlement Stipulation. 7. In accordance with the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order, the Court hereby finds that the forms and methods of notifying the Class of the Settlement and its terms and conditions met the requirements of due process, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Section 21D(a)(7) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7), as amended by the Private Securities 3 Litigation Reform Act of 1995; constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; and constituted due and sufficient notice of these proceedings and the matters set forth herein, including the Settlement and Plan of Allocation, to all persons and entities entitled to such notice. No Class Member is relieved from the terms and conditions of the Settlement, including the releases provided for in the Settlement Stipulation, based upon the contention or proof that such Class Member failed to receive actual or adequate notice. A full opportunity has been offered to the Class Members to object to the proposed Settlement and to participate in the hearing thereon. The Court further finds that the notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, were fully discharged. Thus, it is hereby determined that all Settlement Class Members are bound by this Final Judgment and Order except those persons listed on Exhibit 1 to this Final Judgment and Order. 8. The Court hereby finds that the proposed Plan of Allocation is a fair and reasonable method to allocate the Net Settlement Fund among Class Members, and Lead Counsel and the Claims Administrator are directed to administer the Plan of Allocation in accordance with its terms and the terms of the Stipulation. 9. Upon the Effective Date, the Class Representatives shall, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Persons, whether or not such Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release or shares in the Settlement Fund. Claims to enforce the terms of the Stipulation are not released. 10. Upon the Effective Date, all Class Members, and anyone claiming through or on behalf of any of them, will be forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, prosecuting, or continuing to prosecute any action or other proceeding in any court of law or equity, 4 arbitration tribunal, administrative forum, or any other forum, asserting the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons. 11. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged the Class Representatives, each and all of the Class Members, and Class Representatives’ counsel, including Lead Counsel, from all Defendants’ Claims. Defendants’ Claims do not include claims to enforce the terms of the Stipulation or any order of the Court in the Litigation. 12. The Settling Parties may file the Settlement Stipulation and/or this Order and Final Judgment in any proceedings that may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Settlement Stipulation, the Settlement, or this Order and Final Judgment. 13. The finality of this Final Judgment and Order shall not be affected, in any manner, by rulings that the Court may make on Lead Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses or an award to the Class Representatives. 14. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of Defendants or their respective Related Parties; (ii) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of Defendants or their respective Related Parties in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; (iii) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission, or evidence, that any claim asserted by the Class Representatives was not valid in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, 5 administrative agency or other tribunal or (iv) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the appropriateness of treating the Litigation as a class action for any other purpose than the Settlement. Defendants and/or their respective Related Parties may file the Stipulation and/or this Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 15. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 16. Lead Counsel is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $600,000.00, and expenses in the amount of $28,818.78, such amounts to be paid out of the Settlement Fund immediately following entry of this Order. Class Counsel shall thereafter be solely responsible for allocating the attorneys’ fees and expenses among other Plaintiff’s counsel in the manner in which Class Counsel in good faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the initiation, prosecution, and resolution of the Actions. In the event that this Judgment does not become Final, and any portion of the Fee and Expense Award has already been paid from the Settlement Fund, Class Counsel and all other plaintiffs’ counsel to whom Class Counsel has distributed payments shall within ten (10) business days of entry of the order rendering the Settlement and Judgment non-Final or notice of the Settlement being terminated or precludes the Effective Date from occurring, refund the Settlement Fund the Fee and Expense Award paid to Class Counsel and, if applicable, distributed to other counsel. 6 17. Lead Plaintiff Nancy Lin is awarded $5000, and Plaintiff Gilbert Lee Silverbird is awarded $3000 ($8,000 total), as Compensatory Awards for reasonable costs and expenses directly relating to the representation of the Class as provided in 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4), such amounts to be paid from the Settlement Fund upon the Effective Date of the Settlement. 18. In the event that the Settlement is terminated as provided in the Stipulation, or the Effective Date otherwise does not occur, then this Judgment, and all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith, shall be vacated, rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation, and this Judgment shall be without prejudice to the rights of the Class Representatives, the other Class Members, and Defendants, and the Settling Parties shall revert to their respective positions in the Litigation as of November 19, 2020, as provided in the Stipulation. 19. Without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation. 20. The Court directs immediate entry of this Judgment by the Clerk of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 16, 2021 DATED: ________________ _______________________________________ THE HONORABLE MARY KAY. VYSKOCIL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
