Mejia Mendez et al v. Sweet Sam's Baking Company LLC et al, No. 1:2018cv09910 - Document 78 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 72 MOTION to Preclude Evidence and Testimony. MOTION to Disqualify Counsel . filed by Johanny Demoya, Kelvin Mejia Mendez, Andres Perez. The parties shall appear on January 10, 2020, at 10 :15 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY, for oral argument on their cross-motions to disqualify and preclude. At oral argument, counsel should be prepared to address, in addition to the arguments and issues addressed in their memoranda of law, whether Mr. Androphy's testimony and email even if relevant to Mr. Perez's credibility are inadmissible under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence as extrinsic evidenc e of specific conduct. See, e.g., Lewis v. Baker, 526 F.2d 470, 475 (2d Cir. 1975) ("The relevancy of testimony which aids in the jury's determination of a party's credibility and veracity has been repeatedly affirmed. Although an oppo nent is not permitted to adduce extrinsic evidence that a party lied on a previous occasion, he may nonetheless ask questions to that end." (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). SO ORDERED. (Oral Argument set for 1/10/2020 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/26/2019) (kv)

Download PDF
Mejia Mendez et al v. Sweet Sam's Baking Company LLC et al UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : KELVIN MEJIA MENDEZ and ANDRES PEREZ, : individually and on behalf of others similarly : situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : -v: : SWEET SAM’S BAKING COMPANY LLC (d/b/a : Sweet Sam’s Baking Company), DAVID : GROGAN, and ESPERANZA LOPEZ, : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X Doc. 78 18-CV-9910 (JMF) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: The parties shall appear on January 10, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY, for oral argument on their cross-motions to disqualify and preclude. At oral argument, counsel should be prepared to address, in addition to the arguments and issues addressed in their memoranda of law, whether Mr. Androphy’s testimony and email — even if relevant to Mr. Perez’s credibility — are inadmissible under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence as extrinsic evidence of specific conduct. See, e.g., Lewis v. Baker, 526 F.2d 470, 475 (2d Cir. 1975) (“The relevancy of testimony which aids in the jury’s determination of a party’s credibility and veracity has been repeatedly affirmed. Although an opponent is not permitted to adduce extrinsic evidence that a party lied on a previous occasion, he may nonetheless ask questions to that end.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 26, 2019 New York, New York __________________________________ JESSE M. FURMAN United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.