Villar v. AHRC Home Care Services, Inc. et al, No. 1:2018cv09174 - Document 59 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions in support of their revised settlement agreement and heard from the parties at the October 20, 2020 conference. (ECF 53, 56, 57). Prior issues addressed in the Court's August 20, 202 0 Opinion and Order (ECF 51) regarding the settlement's compliance with the FLSA and Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) have been resolved. Accordingly, the Court approves the parties' preliminary settlement, see attached. (ECF 48, 56-1). The parties are directed to submit a joint status letter in 30 days, or December 7, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 11/6/2020) (rro)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Villar v. AHRC Home Care Services, Inc. et al Doc. 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x FRANCISCO VILLAR, on behalf of himself and, : : FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and the Class, : : Plaintiff, : : -against: AHRC HOME CARE SERVICES, INC. and : NYSARC, INC., : : Defendants. 18-CV-9174 (OTW) ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in support of their revised settlement agreement and heard from the parties at the October 20, 2020 conference. (ECF 53, 56, 57). Prior issues addressed in the Court’s August 20, 2020 Opinion and Order (ECF 51) regarding the settlement’s compliance with the FLSA and Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) have been resolved. Accordingly, the Court approves the parties’ preliminary settlement, see attached. (ECF 48, 56-1). The parties are directed to submit a joint status letter in 30 days, or December 7, 2020. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2020 New York, New York s/ Ona T. Wang Ona T. Wang United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
