Jordan v. Pierre et al, No. 1:2018cv08528 - Document 63 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, when the plaintiff sought an Order authorizing service via the "nail and mail" method of CPLR § 308(4), the Court ordered that the plaintiff should first provide the defendants' bus iness addresses to the Marshals so that they could attempt to serve Bichotte and Davidson at their business addresses. The plaintiff should therefore attempt to obtain the business addresses for Bichotte and Davidson and provide those addresses t o the Marshals. If it is impracticable for the plaintiff to ascertain Bichotte's and Davidson's business addresses with the exercise of due diligence, the plaintiff may write a letter to the Court explaining his attempts to obtain the defendants' business addresses and seeking leave to use the nail and mail service method under CPLR § 308(4). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/28/2019) (mro)

Download PDF
Jordan v. Pierre et al Doc. 63 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.