Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America et al, No. 1:2018cv08152 - Document 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER. The Court issued an order on October 21, 2020, see Docket Entry No. 158, indicating that discovery-related matters presented to the Court through a letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 157, were not referred to the Court and should be presente d to the assigned district judge. That conclusion was erroneous, as discovery-related matters were referred to the Court via the Opinion and Order appearing at Docket Entry No. 108. Therefore, the Court's order, Docket Entry No. 158 is hereby vacated and the Court shall address the letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 157. So ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 10/22/2020) (rjm)

Download PDF
Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America et al Doc. 159 Case 1:18-cv-08152-JFK Document 159 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X : PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, -againstMITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and AON RISK SERVICES, : : : ORDER 18-CV-8152 (JFK) (KNF) : : Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------X KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court issued an order on October 21, 2020, see Docket Entry No. 158, indicating that discovery-related matters presented to the Court through a letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 157, were not referred to the Court and should be presented to the assigned district judge. That conclusion was erroneous, as discovery-related matters were referred to the Court via the Opinion and Order appearing at Docket Entry No. 108. Therefore, the Court’s order, Docket Entry No. 158 is hereby vacated and the Court shall address the letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 157. Dated: New York, New York October 22, 2020 SO ORDERED: Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.