Bayoh v. Afropunk Fest 2015 LLC et al, No. 1:2018cv05820 - Document 184 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 172 MOTION to Vacate July 11, 2018 Order. filed by Jocelyn Cooper, Matthew Morgan, Afropunk LLC. The defendants December 2, 2020 motion to vacate the July 11, 2018 preliminary injunction is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the defendants and close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/18/2020) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bayoh v. Afropunk Fest 2015 LLC et al Doc. 184 Case 1:18-cv-05820-DLC-KNF Document 184 Filed 12/18/20 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- X : MAMBU BAYOH, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : AFROPUNK LLC, MATTHEW MORGAN and : JOCELYN COOPER, individually, : : Defendants. : : --------------------------------------- X 18cv5820 (DLC) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: On July 11, 2018, the defendants were preliminarily enjoined from any infringing use, sale, or distribution of the plaintiff’s allegedly infringed photographs. For the following reasons, the defendants’ motion to vacate the July 11, 2018 preliminary injunction is granted. Background In 2015, defendant Afropunk paid plaintiff Mambu Bayoh to provide photographs that could be used in connection with the 2015 Afropunk music festival in Brooklyn, New York. Afropunk paid Bayoh $1,200 and received twenty-eight photographs from him. The parties began to dispute the scope of the license Bayoh had granted Afropunk almost immediately. On June 27, 2018, Bayoh filed this lawsuit, seeking damages and injunctive relief, for the alleged infringement of his Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:18-cv-05820-DLC-KNF Document 184 Filed 12/18/20 Page 2 of 4 copyright in the photographs. Bayoh moved for a preliminary injunction, and a hearing on the injunction was scheduled for July 11. The defendants had not yet appeared in this action, however, and they did not oppose the preliminary injunction. On July 11, a preliminary injunction issued and enjoined the defendants from any infringing use, sale, or distribution of the plaintiff’s allegedly infringed photographs. On November 10, as this litigation neared its conclusion, the defendants expressed an intent to move to vacate the 2018 preliminary injunction. On December 2, the defendants filed their motion to vacate. The plaintiff opposed the defendants’ motion on December 8, and the defendants filed their reply on December 11. Also on December 11, an Opinion addressed the plaintiff’s request for a permanent injunction. The plaintiff has been unable to show that he is entitled to an award of damages, and therefore had resurrected a claim for a permanent injunction. The Opinion concluded that the plaintiff had failed to produce any evidence that he had suffered, was suffering, or would suffer any irreparable harm. Bayoh v. Afropunk LLC, No. 18CV5820 (DLC), 2020 WL 7318277, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2020). Accordingly, the plaintiff’s request for permanent injunctive relief was denied, and the December 17 non-jury trial scheduled 2 Case 1:18-cv-05820-DLC-KNF Document 184 Filed 12/18/20 Page 3 of 4 to address that request was cancelled. Id. at *5. Familiarity with that Opinion is assumed and it is incorporated by reference. All that remains to be decided in this case is the defendants’ motion to vacate the 2018 preliminary injunction. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to vacate that injunction is granted. Discussion “On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a[n] . . . order[] . . . for the following reasons: . . . applying [the judgment] prospectively is no longer equitable; or . . . any other reason that justifies relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). “[A] court may issue a preliminary injunction in a copyright case only if the plaintiff . . . has demonstrated ‘that he is likely to suffer irreparable injury in the absence of an injunction.’” Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68, 79–80 (2d Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). The Opinion of December 11, 2020 denied Bayoh’s claim for permanent injunctive relief on the specific ground that he had produced no evidence of irreparable harm. Accordingly, there is no longer any basis to concluded that he is “likely to suffer” any irreparable injury. Since Bayoh cannot establish any 3 Case 1:18-cv-05820-DLC-KNF Document 184 Filed 12/18/20 Page 4 of 4 irreparable harm, it is both necessary and appropriate to vacate the preliminary injunction. Conclusion The defendants’ December 2, 2020 motion to vacate the July 11, 2018 preliminary injunction is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the defendants and close the case. Dated: New York, New York December 18, 2020 __________________________________ DENISE COTE United States District Judge 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
