Richardson et al v. City of New York, No. 1:2017cv09447 - Document 103 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER terminating 102 Motion re: 102 MOTION for Clarification of the Court's May 12, 2021 Opinion and Order on Class Certification re: 101 Memorandum & Opinion,,, . The Court hereby clarifies that its May 12, 20 21 opinion and order dismissed Annette Richardson's, Debra Poe's, and Stephanie Thomas's claims for injunctive relief only, preserving their claims for money damages. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 102. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/26/2021) (js)

Download PDF
Richardson et al v. City of New York Doc. 103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANNETTE RICHARDSON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 17-CV-9447 (JPO) ORDER -vCITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court hereby clarifies that its May 12, 2021 opinion and order dismissed Annette Richardson’s, Debra Poe’s, and Stephanie Thomas’s claims for injunctive relief only, preserving their claims for money damages. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 102. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2021 New York, New York ____________________________________ J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.