In Re: Neelam Taneja, No. 1:2017cv09429 - Document 26 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Reconsideration, filed by Neelam Taneja. This Court never issued an indicative ruling under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1. On August 29, 2018, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an Order holding the appellant's pending appeal in abeyance until a final ruling on the appellant's motion for reconsideration was issued. Because the appellant did not file any additional materials supporting her appeal of the bankruptcy c ourt's decision, her motion for reconsideration is denied. See Davidson v. Scully, 172 F. Supp. 2d 458, 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) ("A motion for reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions o r data that the court overlooked -- matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court"). Well after the June 15 deadline, the appellant filed a proposed order that would discharge her debt un der 11 U.S.C. § 727. That proposed order is without basis and does not support her motion for reconsideration. Therefore, the Court declines to sign the proposed order. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/15/18) (yv)