Turner v. City of New York et al, No. 1:2017cv08563 - Document 48 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. The Court hereby ORDERS the following: The Court finds it troubling that plaintiff has not yet executed the necessary releases. Plaintiff has indicated that he is willing to so, and the Court orders that plaintiff shall supply defe ndants with executed releases not later than Wednesday, June 6, 2018. Plaintiff did not respond to or oppose defendants' motion to compel responses to certain interrogatory requests. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS that portion of the motio n as unopposed. Plaintiff shall respond to the interrogatory requests as requested not later than Friday, June 8, 2018. The Court construes plaintiff's letter at ECF No. 47 as a cross-motion for discovery. Defendants shall respond to that motion not later than Tuesday, June 5, 2018. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the open motion at ECF No. 43. SO ORDERED. re: 43 LETTER MOTION to Compel addressed to Judge Katherine B. Forrest from Debra March dated 5/25/2018 filed by M Pennant, Pazmino, City of New York. (Responses due by 6/5/2018). (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/1/2018) (rjm).

Download PDF
Turner v. City of New York et al Doc. 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X : DAQUAN TURNER, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : THE CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O. PAZMINO : (Shield # 1662), and P.O. M. PENNANT (Shield : # 23307), : : Defendants. : : -------------------------------------------------------------------X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: June 1, 2018 17-cv-8563 (KBF) OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of defendants’ discovery motion dated May 25, 2018 (ECF No. 43) as well as plaintiff’s response dated May 31, 2018 (ECF No. 47). Having reviewed both letters, the Court hereby ORDERS the following: The Court finds it troubling that plaintiff has not yet executed the necessary releases. Plaintiff has indicated that he is willing to so, and the Court orders that plaintiff shall supply defendants with executed releases not later than Wednesday, June 6, 2018. Plaintiff did not respond to or oppose defendants’ motion to compel responses to certain interrogatory requests. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS that portion of the motion as unopposed. Plaintiff shall respond to the interrogatory requests as requested not later than Friday, June 8, 2018. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The Court construes plaintiff’s letter at ECF No. 47 as a cross-motion for discovery. Defendants shall respond to that motion not later than Tuesday, June 5, 2018. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the open motion at ECF No. 43. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York June 1, 2018 ______________________________________ KATHERINE B. FORREST United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.