Doe v. Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. et al, No. 1:2017cv08220 - Document 70 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 61 LETTER MOTION for Discovery /Quashing of Subpoenas addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Marjorie Mesidor, Esq. dated July 25, 2018. filed by Charlie Newman-Scheel. This case was referred to me f or general pretrial management, including discovery motions, nondispositive pretrial motions, and settlement. On July 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed a letter motion to quash two subpoenas allegedly served on two of Plaintiff's former employers. ( ECF 61). In a response filed July 30, 2018, Defendants represented to the Court that they have not yet served the subpoenas. (ECF 63). Because the subpoenas were not served, the motion to quash is DENIED AS PREMATURE. If Plaintiff wishes to mov e for a protective order in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices, preventing service of the subpoenas, Plaintiff shall do so by October 10, 2018. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed the close the open motion at ECF 61. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 10/10/2018.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 10/4/2018) (rro)